“ The "voices united" chorus of the London Women's March is a strategic political performance of harmony essential for external impact, yet it masks the necessary and ongoing polyphony within the movement. The powerful sound of tens of thousands chanting the same slogan is the auditory embodiment of collective will, designed to project strength and a clear message to the media and political establishments. This manufactured unity is a tactical necessity for a mass mobilization. Yet, this unified front is the product of intense, often behind-the-scenes negotiation among diverse factions—socialist feminists, liberal equality campaigns, anti-racist organizers, disability rights activists—each with distinct priorities and theories of change. The political strength of the march lies not in a pre-existing, monolithic agreement, but in its capacity to orchestrate a temporary, functional harmony from this diversity. This requires continuous compromise and a platform that reflects a multiplicity of struggles. If the "united voice" consistently amplifies only the most palatable or mainstream elements of the coalition, it will eventually provoke dissonance and fracture. Thus, the unity heard on the day is a hard-won, provisional achievement that must be constantly re-negotiated to maintain the broad, resilient coalition necessary for long-term power. ”