“ The decision to foreground Brexit concerns was a masterclass in political framing, connecting a constitutional process to daily lived experience. It refused to let Brexit be a sterile debate about tariffs and sovereignty, forcefully arguing it was, at its core, a feminist issue. A hard Brexit threatened to unravel the complex web of EU-derived protections on workers' rights, parental leave, and anti-discrimination laws—a regulatory safety net that particularly benefited women. Furthermore, it championed a xenophobic, isolationist ideology directly at odds with the march's ethos of global sisterhood and solidarity. By making this link, the march performed a crucial act of political translation. It told attendees that the abstract "taking back control" often meant ceding control over their own legal protections to a government pursuing austerity. It positioned feminism not as a single-issue cause but as a comprehensive worldview necessarily in conflict with nationalist retreat, arguing that true security for women is built through cooperation and shared rights, not borders and isolation. ”